Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The design of the Foley catheter has not changed since 1937. Scientists interested in medical technology tend to focus on state-of-the-art designs for newsworthy specialties rather than the more mundane technologies of daily life. We interviewed 36 people living with a long-term urinary catheter in the United Kingdom, who described limitations of the current catheter design, including infections and complications and consequences for social life and relationships, and their perceptions of whose responsibility it was to improve the design. All took steps to hide the urine bag, but the need to use a catheter and urine bag had, for some, a very detrimental effect on social life and relationships. People living with long-term catheters are relatively isolated at home and dealing with many different underlying health problems, undermining opportunities to speak with a collective patient voice. Qualitative health researchers could act as a conduit to help stimulate new designs.

Original publication

DOI

10.1177/1049732315570135

Type

Journal article

Journal

Qual Health Res

Publication Date

01/2016

Volume

26

Pages

154 - 163

Keywords

narrative inquiry, qualitative analysis, research, qualitative, technology, medical, urinary catheter, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Long Term Adverse Effects, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Self Concept, United Kingdom, United States, Urinary Catheterization, Urinary Catheters, Young Adult